Banishing Immigration Newspeak



Learn Politics on mps-politics.com. Banishing Immigration Newspeak article will help answer your questions on Politics.We at mps-politics.com specialize in Politics. Politics at mps-politics.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.

For nearly thirty years, Michigan's Lake Superior State
University has released an annual List of Banished Words, a brief
inventory of the year's most annoyingly popular expressions, with
the recommendation they be 'banished from the Queen's English for
mis-use, over-use and general uselessness.'

This year, the tiresome 'metrosexual' and the insufferable 'bling
bling' were deservedly condemned, as were several war-inspired
entrants such as 'embedded journalist' and 'smoking gun.' I was
disappointed that none of my three choices for this annual
dishonor made the cut, however. My nominees for banishment were:
'Guest worker program,' 'Matching willing workers with willing
employers,' and the worst offender, 'Work Americans won't do,' as
in 'our economy needs illegal immigrants because they do work
Americans won't do.'

Combined, these three Orwellian phrases are calculated to convey
the impression that there are certain occupations so inherently
dangerous or otherwise disagreeable that we lazy, self-indulgent,
American crybabies must rely on hardy immigrant stock to roll up
their sleeves and get the job done for us. Tell that to a
Pennsylvania coal miner!

Although it's true that less glamorous jobs are frequently filled
by illegal aliens, the jobs themselves are not intrinsically
unacceptable. Rather, the ready supply of illegal labor has
resulted in many perfectly satisfactory jobs becoming
unacceptable. In short, illegal aliens will work under unsanitary
and unsafe conditions for minimum wage or even less, thereby
lowering standards, and as long as employers can fill jobs by
exploiting illegals, there will simply be no incentive to improve
wages or working conditions.

A recent piece by Nancy L. Othón and Mike Clary in the South
Florida Sun-Sentinel illustrates this principle in action with
the story of Gregorio Ruiz Aviles and Lauro Marquez Hernandez,
two young Mexican illegal alien construction workers crushed to
death in the collapse of a three-story building on which they
were working. Five other men were injured in the accident. The
Florida company which employed them was fined $2.4 million for
having no workers' compensation insurance, but according to Othón
and Clary, 'five months after the deaths of Ruiz and Marquez, few
public officials, employers, workers and immigrant advocates
express much hope that change would come soon in an industry
where undocumented workers willingly take any job they can get.'

Worse still, employers who play by the rules are easily underbid
by their unscrupulous rivals, and the downward pressure on wages
and safety intensifies. And this phenomenon is certain to worsen
-- not lessen -- under any program which would legalize the
process. Why? Because a 'documented' worker is easier to deport,
and will therefore be more likely to do 'work Americans won't do'
to avoid unemployment and ineligibility. A guest worker program
will therefore simply institutionalize the current gray market
for employees who will tolerate the intolerable.

It's a tenuous doctrine, that American workers are so expensive
that even American companies can't afford them, and the plan to
extricate ourselves from this invented predicament by pinning our
hopes on the newly legendary Mexican work ethic is flimsier
still. And yet, there is some evidence that muddleheaded
Americans are being persuaded by the hypnotic repetition of
immigration Newspeak issuing from the White House, the Congress,
and the major news media. A February 2004 Gallup Poll found that
46% of Americans support President Bush's plan to legalize
Mexican nationals currently living here illegally, 'as long as
they hold jobs that no U.S. citizen wanted to do.'

George Orwell famously observed that political speech is
'designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and
to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.' What else can be
said of a phrase such as 'undocumented worker' which presupposes
the subject is working, and transmutes the violation of our
borders into an apparent paperwork mixup? Will we now refer to a
bank robbery as an 'unauthorized withdrawal?' And what shall we
call the children of undocumented workers? Undocumented students?

Orwell forewarned us more than fifty years ago that sloppy
language begets foolish thinking -- and vice versa -- and it's as
true today as ever. Purposely misleading expressions such as
'work Americans won't do' are solid proof that big lies still fit
neatly into short phrases.

It's time we banished them.



Eliminating Candida. - Banishing Candida symptoms naturally - 100%
How To Arrive And Thrive In The Uk. - The only complete guide to Uk immigration. Learn safely how to successfully emigrate, live and work in any part of Britain.

Stephen ColbertMore than 300 super PACs have raked in nearly $100 million so far in their efforts to pick a winner in the 2012 presidential contest, according to new Federal Election Commission data analyzed by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

The super PACs range from the serious to the satirical.

The "independent expenditure-only committee"  supporting Mitt Romney, for example, has reported raising about $30.2 million, making it the most well funded group of its kind. On the other hand, political satirist Stephen Colbert's super PAC is no spoof. It has raked in more than $1 million - no laughing matter.

But most of super PACs are innocuously named and, at first glance, their motivation isn't clear. Who is super PAC Winning Our Future supporting? What about American Crossroads? Who gives to these big super PACs, and how are the millions being spent?

Read more ...

[Photo: Political satirist Stephen Colbert / Credit: Getty Images Entertainment]

Super PACs Raise $100 Million to Influence Presidential Race originally appeared on About.com US Politics on Saturday, February 4th, 2012 at 09:57:12.

Permalink | Comment | Email this



Article Index: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60


More Articles:


1. Minor Disruptions Cause Chaos in Transportation By Lance Winslow
Recently the Los Angeles Transit workers are on Strike and the RTD is not operating, this happens every few years. This disrupts the flow of people on their way to get food, go to work, attend college or visit friends. When the flow of transportation is disrupted it hurts our trust in the integrity of the system and affects our lives. When you design a city and have a transportation system to support the population and then turn it off you cause chaos.In Los Angeles they had a grocery store st…

2. Political Sports Player of the Week - Oct. 10, 2005
Mohamed ElBaradei is this week's Political Sports Player of the Week. Mr. Baradei and the organization he leads, The International Atomic Energy Agency, won this year's Nobel Peace Prize, which was announced this week. The White House strongly criticized ElBaradei in the period leading up to the start of the Iraq War, contending that his findings, indicating that Iraq did not have any WMD, including nuclear weapons, was absolutely wrong. You can read the article at www.democracynow.org/article.p…

3. Paper Industry By Lance Winslow
The paper industry in the US is hurting. Due to supply and demand prices are way up. If you look at the changes, due to the growth in housing and price of wood and increased government regulations with Sarbaines Oxley Act you can see why we need more and more paper.The government is the biggest user of paper and say they need to purchase more paper to hassle businesses with paperwork and forms and taxes and fees and fines and rules and etc, etc.You can see that if it weren’t for Uncle Sam’s cl…
Search Engine Optimization
4. PALS in Pakistan Part Four – A Nuclear Precedent By Teve Torbes
The decision to provide another nuclear power with PALS technology is not unprecedented. The United States has transferred the technology successfully to Britain, France, and even to the Soviet Union in the aftermath of the Cuban missile crisis (Man). Pakistan has made indirect overtures to the United States in what seems to be a bid to obtain the devices, with Pakistani officials making public suggestions to their U.S. counterparts that cooperation of the U.S. with Pakistan on nuclear safety …