Can Indianapolis afford an NFL franchise?Learn Politics on mps-politics.com. Can Indianapolis afford an NFL franchise? article will help answer your questions on Politics.We at mps-politics.com specialize in Politics. Politics at mps-politics.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
Since at least 1997 - only 14 years after the 63,000-seat Hoosier Dome was built for $82 million - Indianapolis Colts owner Jim Irsay was publicly lobbying for a new stadium to host his team. Although pushed back by the Pacers' $175 million taxpayer-supported Conseco Field House deal, he said his turn would come. He has repeatedly said that his NFL franchise 'cannot survive' on the revenues provided from the RCA Dome, and that a new stadium is needed 'sooner or later.' It's tough making big money on an NFL franchise in a market this size without taxpayers subsidizing much of the costs. Taxpayers coughed up $20 million in 1998 to enlarge the RCA Dome's suites and enhance the value of its expensive box seats. This actually cut the dome's capacity to 57,900 seats, making it the smallest stadium in the league. In 2003 the team ranked 27th out of 32 NFL teams in terms of revenue and 29th in value. 'We're significantly, significantly below the average (in revenue), and that disparity is growing,' Irsay told Indianapolis television viewers. 'Yet the average determines what our expenses are with the salary cap. That's what makes things so difficult.' However, as the Cincinnati Bengals have proven, a new stadium does not ensure a better profit. Even with a new stadium, the Bengals were 24th in revenue in 2002, with only $4 million more in revenues than the Colts. The Colts' lease at the RCA Dome runs until 2013, but the team can break the deal after the 2006 season if its revenues aren't greater than or equal to the median in the NFL in two out of the next three seasons. Indianapolis could require the Colts to stay by paying the difference between the team's revenues and the league's median. In 2002 the Colts fell short by about $13 million. Under this arrangement, Indianapolis taxpayers presently pay the Colts about $12 million per year in direct subsidies. The long-term solution, Irsay proposes, is a new stadium with more expensive suites, club seats and ticket prices. He says the team's future in Indianapolis depends on 'the ability … to market yourself and sell seats, particularly the expensive suites and club seats.' Agreed. The RCA Dome has 104 suites. The league's top franchise, the Washington Redskins, offers 280. The difference in revenue between the Colts' and Redskins' luxury suites likely exceeds $15 million annually. Total team revenues were $137 million and $227 million, respectively, in 2002. Certainly it behooves Irsay to shop his team to the city that gives him the best deal. During the past decade, 21 of the league's 32 teams have received new or renovated stadiums. An average sweetheart deal is a $323-million stadium, paid 65 percent by taxpayers , that holds 69,200 spectators. But here are the $66,000 questions for Mr. Irsay: Even with an average $323-million stadium funded two-thirds by taxpayers, can the Colts sell more suites at greater prices to bring team revenues above the NFL median? Likewise, can the central Indiana football market sustain more suites, box seats and higher prices to keep the Colts in town? I've been thinking of recommending that the Libertarian Party buy the naming rights to the next Indianapolis Colts' stadium, but now I'm having second thoughts. At a recent sold-out home game, I was unable to sell the two extra $45-seats that I had - at any price. There was no one besides ticket scalpers to give the tickets. I swallowed the $90 in losses, not to mention two grossly expensive $6 beers during the game. (Hey, I was thirsty and now have my third plastic commemorative Colts cup!) Before a new stadium becomes economically realistic in Indianapolis, demand for Colts tickets, box seats and luxury suites must exceed their supply. This burden of truth falls on Jim Irsay, and he must meet this before taxpayers make more concessions. Funding a new stadium with $400-plus million of taxpayer debt (excluding interest) is to gamble on the team's ability to sell itself to more fans and at a higher premium. This will be a much harder task than giving away my extra tickets. (Originally published on November 16, 2004) Almost Free Furniture. - Furniture anyone can afford! - Affiliates: High interest, quality and conversion! Visit our website to see our affiliate tools. How I Made $16,452.47 With The Xbox 360. - How to make big money with the Xbox 360 and make enough to afford your own.
See also: 2012 Republican Primary Results And he did so with the help of a super PAC, a new breed of political-action committee that can raise and spend unlimited amounts of cash from from corporations, unions, individuals and associations. Federal Election Commission records show that the Restore Our Future independent expenditure-only committee, or super PAC, had more than $23.6 million in cash on hand at the end of 2011. The super PAC, which is supporting Romney's bid for president, actually had more money in the bank than the candidate himself, who reported having $20 million at the end of the year. And that super PAC spent millions buying attack ads criticizing Gingrich. So how do super PACs work? What laws govern them? How did they come into being? And how closely are they allowed to work with the actual candidates? Here are a few questions and answers about super PACs. [Photo caption: Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney and his wife greet supporters after winning this week's Florida primary. Credit: Joe Raedle/Getty Images News] Related Stories:
Romney Wins Big in Florida, With Help From Super PAC originally appeared on About.com US Politics on Wednesday, February 1st, 2012 at 21:46:33. Article Index: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 |
More Articles:1. Dubai Court to Start Proceedings Against Stock-market Violators By Jitendra Fca DUBAI: A Dubai court will start on Tuesday the trial of six investors and brokers charged with conducting bogus trades on the shares of Dubai Islamic Bank in August, the state news agency WAM reported. The case, which led to the cancellation of trades worth $2.6 billion in the stock on the Dubai bourse, had shaken the U.A.E.'s financial community and renewed calls for enforcing even tougher regulations to stamp out market abuses. Share prices in the U.A.E. often fluctuate before key announceme… 2. Socrates, Politics and Axe Murder: A Look At Gay Marriage This week, I attended a reading by Christopher Phillips. He is the author of Socrates' Café: A Fresh Taste of Philosophy, and has been described as the 'Johnny Appleseed of philosophy' because of his penchant for starting meaningful dialogues with groups around the world. He was in town to promote his newest book, Six Questions for Socrates: A Modern-Day Journey of Discovery Through World Philosophy. Because I happen to live in Portland, Oregon, a city with a reputation for contemplative people … 3. Howard Dean's Big Fat Mouth By Doug Krieger “The only time I open my mouth is when I exchange feet . . . man, we’ve gone from Deep Throat to Dean’s throat in the space of one week!”These and other hilarious comments have been made of the hysterical doctor from Vermont of late who, as DNC Chairman, is determined to make wedge politics a thing of the present Democratic Party in its attempt to widen the already polarized American electorate.When the likes of Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, and Barney Frank say that Dean’s remarks regarding people… CNF Stock Nicole Kidman 4. Immortality and Mortality in the Economic Sciences By Sam Vaknin, Ph.D. Roberto Calvo Macias, a young author and thinker from Spain, once wrote to me that it is impossible to design a coherent philosophy of Economy without accounting for the (sad?) fact that we are mortals. This insight is intriguing. It is not that we refrain from Death in dealing with matters economic. What are estate laws, annuities, life insurance policies - but ways to cope with the Great Harvester? But this, admittedly, only scratch the non-profound surface of the question.The industrial rev… |
||||
