How The Republicans Stole The 2004 US ElectionLearn Politics on mps-politics.com. How The Republicans Stole The 2004 US Election article will help answer your questions on Politics.We at mps-politics.com specialize in Politics. Politics at mps-politics.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
After November 2nd, bits and pieces of the truth started surfacing. As intellectuals started investigating and uncovering the evidence, it became clear that George W. and his regime committed the most heinous crime in American History, stealing the 2004 Presidential election. In one night, they killed democracy in the United States of America. Now, the world must continue to deal with a right wing fundamentalist regime that is in control of the most powerful and deadly military in the world. The following is a very brief summary highlighting the evidence that has been accumulated proving that John kerry never had a chance of becoming President. The Republicans fixed the election so that George W. Bush would win. The brief facts I have listed have been taken from many important research sites run by people dedicated to uncovering the truth. Following the summary, I have listed sites where I obtained the evidence. Please go to these sites, read what has been uncovered and visit the important links to other research sites. The world needs to know that George W. Bush never received the majority of electoral votes in 2000 and 2004 to be President. George W. and his crew are dangerous idealogs and complete frauds. * 'Electronic Voting Machines: A bill was introduced in the House and Senate to outlaw these machines and require a paper printout, but the bill was stalled by the Republican Party, led by House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, and it was not allowed to come to a vote. Shortly after the November 2nd election, countless stories of problems with the machines began to surface. Many people tried to vote for Kerry and said that when the final confirmation screen came up, it said they voted for Bush. Electronic Voting Machines were manufactured mainly by the two companies ESS and Diebold, supporters of the Republican Party. It is the electronic machines that are easy to manipulate and easy to hack. Republican Walden O'Dell is the owner of Diebold and Republican Chuck Hagel is the owner of ESS. Both were openly committed to helping deliver electoral votes to the President. In the states that had verifiable paper trails for their ballots, the exit polls were virtually the same as the real results. However, in the battleground states where electronic voting machines and/or electronic tabulators were used, the exit polls were mysteriously very different from the final reported totals. A U of PA professor stated that it is 'impossible' that the exit poll results could be as far off as they are. Unusual results in the areas where computers were used: In Baker County, Florida, there are 12,887 registered voters, 69.3% of them Democrats and 24.3% of them Republicans. The vote was only 2,180 for Kerry and 7,738 for Bush. In a Democratic stronghold, 5 out of every 7 Democrats voted for Bush??? Very unusual results in Ohio: In many voting precincts, more votes were cast than the number of people who voted. In Cuyahoga county alone, over 93,000 more votes were recorded than registered voters. In some precincts, ten times the number of votes were submitted than the number of registered voters. To date, no logical explanation has been given for this. Remember, those 93,000 votes are included in the state totals that give Bush a 136,000 victory in the state, and that is just one county. In many democratic areas, people waited hours to vote, while Republicans 'challenged' voters' rights to vote, forcing them to fill out a provisional ballot instead of a real ballot. The provisional ballots were not counted on election day. Flyers were sent to democratic areas with an array of false information on them. People were told their voting precinct had changed, that their voter registration was not valid, or that they would go to jail if they tried to vote. There are many reports of not enough voting machines being placed in heavily democratic and minority areas. Many Kerry supporters had to wait in line 8 hours to vote. In one precinct in Ohio, over 4,258 votes were given to Bush where there were only 638 registered voters. In addition to the touch screen machines that produce no paper trail, they are now finding more and more evidence of problems with the 'optical scanners' that were used to tabulate the results in many states. In this case, many people did fill out a paper ballot, and these ballots were fed into scanners that totalled the results. These scanners were also manufactured by Diebold and ESS in many cases and are easily hacked. Many more stories about the black box voting machines, optical scanners, their problems, and the investigation into their tampering are listed on the main page. Blackboxvoting.org is leading the way in the investigation to proving the results were tampered with. Investigations: Six congressmen have sent a letter to the General Accountability Office and asked for urgent attention and investigation, citing tens of thousands of voting irregularities. Ralph Nader has also begun an investigation into Diebold and ESS, starting with a hand recount of the state of New Hampshire.' * * Evidence cited from: http://www.stolenelection2004.com/ http://www.stolenelection2004.com/links.html http://stolenelection.blogspot.com/ The 6 billion plus people in the world need to realize that the United States of America is no longer a free Country. Those that control it, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and the rest of the right wing extremists, are incredibly dangerous men with a fascist agenda bent on shaping the world according to their own disturbing neoconsevative beliefs.
Well Darlings, If you scan through the recent news headlines, you could easily become depressed. Wars and civil disturbances are raging in many parts of the world, with other huge areas battling ... [Author: Michael Knell - Politics and Government - March 28, 2011] Article Index: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 |
More Articles:1. Soft Landing in Downward Business Cycle Predicted 2006 By Lance Winslow Many analysts in many business sectors are considering the writing on the wall, as we approach what could be a rocky downward business cycle. We have issues in the Auto Manufacturing Sector, Transportation and Retail Sectors. Some in the retail sector understand the crunch that the increased gasoline prices at the pump are having on the American Consumer and how this will decrease any potential upward projections on the Christmas Gift retail season for 2005. Some large box store manufacturers … 2. The Unborn and Cloning By Dennis Siluk The UnbornWith all this cloning in the news one can’t help but to treat himself to the human embryo side of the moon, I mean: womb; it’s just brings me back to old news days 20 to 25-years ago. Not sure how far we’ve come, where we are going, and for the most part, where we are at. And like most people you take a stand, be it black, white for gray. And as I indicated in my last article, or one of them, I’m a bit confused on the whole subject. And this is what I think the majority on the lef… 3. MORAL ARMOR Condemns Home and Business Seizure Law By Ronald Springer Nothing could be more alarming for Americans than what I read this morning: “The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that local governments may seize people’s homes and businesses — even against their will — for private economic development.” This is a deplorable moral atrocity to perpetrate against Americans and must be reversed. Those responsible should know that they have destroyed their own credibility in the eyes of a free people, and should now go join the insurgency in Iraq.I never thought … 4. What is the Filibuster-Breaking Nuclear Option? By Garry Gamber What is the so-called “nuclear option” that Senator Bill Frist may deploy soon in a precedent-setting attempt to break a potential filibuster? It sounds ominous, but what is it all about, really?President Bush has the opportunity to nominate and fill numerous federal judicial positions this year. Eventually he will have the opportunity to nominate one or more Supreme Court jusices as well. However,this issue isn’t about the potential Supreme Court nominations yet, but ultimately it will be.… |
||||
