Is speech really free?Learn Politics on mps-politics.com. Is speech really free? article will help answer your questions on Politics.We at mps-politics.com specialize in Politics. Politics at mps-politics.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
Yet how free though is our freedom of speech? There are still topics in life where we are restricted. Legal requirements to stop people talking on matters of national security, censoring upon the internet to protect the innocence of children and laws on slander to name just a few. Are these an obstruction to our freedom of speech or in the better interests of society? This is the area where censorship applies, and as in all cases there are examples of good and bad censorship. A person should have the right to express their views. This is a basic human right. However, does this apply to children? At an early stage a child can be very easily influenced: if we were to adhere to absolute freedom from censorship, would tobacco companies be allowed to advertise in primary schools? An extreme case, but one that adequately illustrates how freedom from censorship can be a dangerous thing. We like to believe we are in a world where innocence can be protected as long as possible, so censors can play an important part in regulating at least part of a child's intake. Parents also play a much more important role - a film may be rated eighteen and over, but if a parent chooses to show it to a child, the censors are not the ones at fault. On the other hand we have the cases where many people believe that censorship went too far. In Britain, there was a law banning the mention of homosexuality in schools. In denying teachers the opportunity to explain to children the different lifestyle choices people can make they were promoting homophobia. 'Gay' is a common insult to school children, and any teenager who has decided that they are gay can be bullied terribly by their contemporaries. If understanding was taught at an earlier level a lot of this could be avoided and the law has since been repealed. A Government can censor the press, but it is very difficult to censor the people. The power of word of mouth is astounding, with sometimes great or deadly results. Trying to control how a person thinks is often against human nature. We all think that we aim to be the best kind of person that we can be, but almost everyone has at some point made a malicious comment of some sort. As we grow older we have to become our own personal censors as we learn to think before we speak. How does one person's freedom of speech affect others? Freedom of speech is a great concept if people were always to speak true and thoughtfully, but it is well known the dangers that rumours can cause. In a case such as known paedophiles, the Government refuse to inform local people of their presence in the area if they have been paroled. Several however have been found and harassed so badly there have been several instances of suicide. In circumstances like these censorship could mean the loss of innocence of children... or the death of a human being. Who can say if someone has been reformed? Certainly no one upon this earth, so censorship and lack of censorship can both have deadly results. Who is to censor the censors? It is a difficult process, as any decisions have to be voted through by boards of directors or politicians. It is hoped that there is some common sense employed, but it is always a very fine line between protecting innocence and privacy, and stifling freedom of speech. There are no clear right and wrong solutions, and one question very often merely leads to another.
I am proud to live in a free country. I believe that censorship is an essential part of that freedom, for the protection of the people, but must always be carried out with immense consideration. WASHINGTON (Reuters) - American knowledge of Russia's nuclear capabilities will dwindle if a new nuclear arms treaty with Moscow is not ratified, the chief U.S. negotiator argued as a Senate panel on Friday scheduled a vote on the document. Article Index: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 |
More Articles:1. Protecting Children From Porn By Don One There’s a new Michigan state register (at https://www.protectmichild.com/) in the works to create a database of e-mail addresses that cannot (under penalty of the law) be spammed with content that could be deemed objectionable to children, most notably porn. The database will extend to include pager and cell phone numbers sometime in the future. Right now, it’s sort of like the national DO NOT CALL registry, but for electronic mail.What happens is that parents and guardians write or phone in t… 2. Why Don't We Listen To Entrepreneurs? By Lance Winslow I just got done reading a series of articles dating from December 2000 to September 2001 (pre-9-11) regarding Larry Ellison's bush to get the government to link all it's databases. Now everyone agrees, but now we are post 9-11. I wonder if Larry Ellison as loud as he can be sometimes ever stood up and said I told ya so? He would have every right to. He warned us. Gates did too, maybe not as verbal about it or graphic as Larry Ellison described the government’s computer databases like a file ca… 3. Federal Trade Commission Franchising Division; Inept? By Lance Winslow Why are we over regulating the franchising industry? What are we doing to an industry which has given so much to America? Is the Federal Trade Commission Franchising Division; inept? They keep making rules and the over disclosure has the average UFOC – Uniform Franchise Offering Circular at over 200 pages? This is insanity; not to mention a waste of paper.No one in the Federal Trade Commission Franchising Division should be allowed to make rules unless they themselves have worked in an actual … 4. Who is the best qualified candidate for the job? What happened to the days when you voted for candidates because of their “abilities”, and not because of their party affiliation, or the popularity they enjoy as a result of expensive media exposure? Have you ever noticed that most Government offices are being held by individuals who are independently wealthy, or who enjoy very strong financial support? This applies to all levels of government, whether it be Federal, State or Local.Individuals may be extremely well-qualified, but their name may… |
||||
