New Fuel Economy Rules on the Big VehiclesLearn Politics on mps-politics.com. New Fuel Economy Rules on the Big Vehicles article will help answer your questions on Politics.We at mps-politics.com specialize in Politics. Politics at mps-politics.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
All automakers would have to comply with the new Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) system by 2011, the most significant change to the program in three decades. Under the current system, automakers must maintain an average of 21.6 miles per gallon for their 2006 model year light trucks, a number that grows to 22.2 miles per gallon for 2007 vehicles. Automakers would need to meet fuel economy targets based on their mix of vehicles. The auto industry, which has fought past attempts to raise fuel economy standards, but expressed support for the plan's direction, said the new system would mean seven straight years of higher gas mileage requirements. General Motors Corp. and Ford Motor Co. have said the current system puts them at a disadvantage against their competitors because sales of large sport utility vehicles must be offset by the sale of smaller light trucks to comply with fuel economy rules. In 2008, smaller sport utility vehicles like the Toyota RAV 4 would need to reach a target of 26.8 mpg while large vehicles such as the Chevrolet Silverado would have to hit 20.4 mpg. Imposing mileage standards would add increased pressure to domestic automakers already struggling with profitability.
New Fuel Economy Rules on the Big Vehicles in USA PORTLAND, Maine (Reuters) - He is the only one of the four contenders for the Republican presidential nomination not to have won a state primary or caucus. Article Index: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 |
More Articles:1. Government Apathy - A Different View Copyright 2006 Al Arnold I have always believed that political apathy starts at the bottom. That is the citizens. They do not go to meetings when issues are being discussed that impact their lives. They do not speak up at the earlyist opportunity to provide input. I recently came across an article that challenges my theory. It was written by someone who just refers to himself as Dan. No last name. It was written in 2002. Dan lives in Britain, but what he says could also refer to the United State… 2. Fast Food : No Legal Recourse Do you eat fast food? You must. According to the House of Representatives, the fast food industry is a significant part of our national economy. It did not become that way be having few customers. Many independent researches have found that fast food is unhealthy and causes weight gain. This research suggests there is something 'faulty' with fast food. Our nation is becoming more obese by the day and many obese people are attributing their weight gain to fast food consumption. In the documentar… 3. Irrational Exuberance of the Dot Com Days Discussed By Lance Winslow It is hard to disagree that there was much irrational exuberance during the Dot Com run-up. Some of the money that flowed into investments for companies with little more than an idea for the Internet or a program that should have ended up Freeware because quite frankly that was all it was really worth, ended up funded with millions in venture capital on their way to a public offering.Many have said including recently an employee for Deloitte that; “Everyone loves the free market until the foll… 4. Our Fellow Creatures By Andy Carloff It is the notion of our time that non-human animals exist for the advancement of the human species. In whatever field -- cookery, fashion, blood-sports -- it is held that we can only be concerned with animals as far as human interests exist. There may be some sympathy for those animals, as to limit practices which cause excruciating suffering, but those may only be limited if they are brought to public light, and if legislators receive enough pressure from the public to change.However, it is… |
||||
