Stopping a Nuclear Bomb on a HydrofoilLearn Politics on mps-politics.com. Stopping a Nuclear Bomb on a Hydrofoil article will help answer your questions on Politics.We at mps-politics.com specialize in Politics. Politics at mps-politics.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
The US Homeland Security is worried about Hydrofoil or Skimmer Craft used as fast moving bombs on water entering one of our ports or Naval shipyards. If you will remember the XXX” Movie with the Hydrofoil Craft with a Biological Weapon which would kill millions of people if it released it’s gaseous cargo. http://www.hollywoodjesus.com/movie/xxx/27.jpeg http://www.hollywoodjesus.com/xxx_photo.htm Although this is hypothetical it is also very possible. One study described our many inlets and rivers such as he Chesapeake, Potomac, San Francisco Bay, Columbia River, Puget Sound, Hudson, Port Houston Ship Lane, Boston Harbor or Tampa Bay. Luckily for us we have great tracking, radar and competent US Navy and US Coast Guard. However what if one was launched from a Cargo Ship outside of US Territory in international waters? Then what, how do you stop something moving that fast or respond to the threat? Some of these high tech versions travel at nearly 100 knots. A ten thousand pound payload, which is what the nuclear bombs weighed that were dropped on Japan in WWII, could easily be carried by a hydrofoil that was 30 feet long. The hypothetical of the XXX movie is questionable because the biological gas would be quickly diluted with the relative wind in such coastal areas from off shore or onshore breeze. But a hydrofoil Unmanned Autonomous Device would render very serious consequences. Obviously a good point for trying to prevent rogue nations from developing Nuclear Weapons, which could end up in the hands of International Terrorists piloting hydrofoils, who do not care if they blow up with the Weapon of Mass Destruction. Once the bomb gets within 1 mile of the shore or enters a harbor there are no longer any possible good outcomes, once it touches land there are only disastrous scenarios. When people run the scenarios and animation programs and study these things, the findings are extremely alarming. http://www.tybeetyme.com/tb/images/bomb_blast_map.gif http://www.parowanprophet.com/maps/mohawk_350_KT_nuke.jpg We should not assume that simply because we board every cargo ship from certain countries that we are safe, these things could come on any type of ship or ultra large yacht. And the technology is well known, used in sport marine, luxury marine, military worldwide. How can you stop a hydrofoil traveling at 100 knots from entering a harbor? One way is to have large high-pressure tanks under water at the mouth of the river or harbor. Similar to giant cylinder propane tanks only the width of the mouth of the inlet, if you fail to hit the hydrofoil with conventional defense weapons, you release all the gas as the hydrofoil enters the harbor. The tanks can be pipelines which are in use, with quick release valves opening upward, the can be closed off tanks with CO2, Oxygen, Hydrogen, methane or other such gas. The gas as it escapes creates a cavity and the hydrofoil or skimmer craft falls as it would over a waterfall tumbling downward. Then the water fills in over it and even if the weapon of mass destruction goes off, it does so underwater which provides one more layer of protection. This is a last resort defense mechanism able to high-speed boats, skimmer craft, hydrofoils and medium sized fast moving ships. Of course this is only one possible way to stop such attacks as we also have missiles, guns, cannons, etc. at the military shipyards, harbors and inlets. Acne Free In 3 Days. - All Natural Cure for stopping acne in 3 days! Newly Increased Commissions. Affiliates receive $16.05 per sale! Stop Sweating And Start Living. - Natural cure for stopping excessive sweat in just two weeks! 50% Commissions. Making political signs is not an easy task at all as even if you have political agendas that need to be addressed, you cannot use it for the wrong reasons. Making such a sign is similar to making any... [Author: Jessica Thomson - Politics and Government - September 19, 2011] Article Index: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 |
More Articles:1. Water at the Roots of Twenty First Century's Conflicts By Bagneki Hugues According to a postulate made by Ignacio Ramonet ecological resources are deemed to constitute the main cause of this new century. Water as a source of scourge concerns: oceans and seas on the one hand (that’s over 71 of the globe surface) and access to potable water (underground reserve and rivers) on the other hand. Over the years, water has gradually become a stake at many levelsWater: an economic stakeWater without any single doubt constitutes a consumption goods and surely the mos… 2. Fixing Our Regulatory Sewage and Minutia Problems By Lance Winslow Some believe that Sarbanes Oxley was necessary to help investors. They say that were problems pre-Sarbanes Oxley and that there was: “no real scrutiny of the "self-regulated" audit firms who at the time were attempting to bolster consulting fees by telling clients what they wanted to hear.” And that Sarbanes Oxley was necessary; well we know that is complete and utter hokum, what we should have done was simply get rid of all the accountants? Lawyers, Regulators and allow businesses to run free… 3. Immortality and Mortality in the Economic Sciences By Sam Vaknin, Ph.D. Roberto Calvo Macias, a young author and thinker from Spain, once wrote to me that it is impossible to design a coherent philosophy of Economy without accounting for the (sad?) fact that we are mortals. This insight is intriguing. It is not that we refrain from Death in dealing with matters economic. What are estate laws, annuities, life insurance policies - but ways to cope with the Great Harvester? But this, admittedly, only scratch the non-profound surface of the question.The industrial rev… Sevilla Hotels Loans UK 4. Liberals Still Don't Get It The joke goes “What do Albert Einstein and George Bush have in common”. Liberals then love to give the punch line which is “Nothing”. Then they laugh and revel in their superior wit because they think that they have just made a funny that knocks down President Bush. Now, I first heard this joke years ago but instead of President Bush, the subject was President Reagan. I then heard it resurface during the 2000 Presidential campaign and again in 2004. But last week when my friend told it to me aga… |
||||