The Gun Control DebateLearn Politics on mps-politics.com. The Gun Control Debate article will help answer your questions on Politics.We at mps-politics.com specialize in Politics. Politics at mps-politics.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
In 1968, the term 'gun control' gained new meaning with the passage of the federal Gun Control Act. Ratified in the wake of two important political assassinations -- Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King, Jr. -- the Act requires that all guns carry serial numbers forever tied to the original purchaser. Additionally, it prohibited gun ownership by convicted felons and, as a result of a 1990s amendment, it requires a criminal background check for purchasers at the time of sale. Certain states have their own gun control legislation, although all are governed by the federal Act of 1968. Individual states can deem their own levels of restriction on concealed weapons and “open carry,” or the visible transporting of a weapon. And restrictions vary widely by state, with New York and Illinois seen as the most restrictive and Arizona and Texas, the most relaxed. The latest incarnation of the gun control debate has been in the form of the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994, which Congress failed to uphold in its latest session. The law prohibited the sale of any semi-automatic assault weapons manufactured after 1994. Supporters of the ban said it helped keep violent weapons off the street, while opponents claimed it imposed a confusing classification system, was overly restrictive and had little effect on controlling violent crime. Gun rights advocates argue that a well-armed public helps prevent crime and ensure personal safety. Gun control proponents, on the other hand, fear that widespread gun ownership actually increases crime rates and leads to other negative outcomes, both public and private. Is the Second Amendment out-of-date, or does it guarantee an integral right?
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republicans expressed frustration on Thursday at the slow pace of negotiations over extending a tax break for workers that expires at the end of the month, accusing President Barack Obama and Senate Democrats of blocking agreement. Article Index: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 |
More Articles:1. Fan the 4 Flames of Freedom On September 11, 2001, 4 freedom-hating zealots tried to snuff out the 4 freedoms that are the foundation of, not only the U.S., but of all freedom-loving countries around the Globe. The terrorists hijacked 4 airplanes and crashed them into 3 of their 4 planned targets: the Pentagon and the 2 financial towers in New York. This attack shocked the U.S. and shocked the world. It produced death and destruction, anger and misery, defiance and calls for revenge.Although some military strikes may be ne… 2. Does America "Get It" about Terrorism? By Douglas Bower I have to be honest. It is time to come clean. Though the rising cost of health care was indeed the primary reason my wife and I uprooted our lives and left America, it was not the only one. In very close competition was the issue of terrorism.We left America on August 1, 2003, and could not leave fast enough. Though health care is the primary reason we cite in our writing for leaving, the ongoing threat of Islamic terrorism in America was another motivating factor. Here is what I thought on t… 3. What If There Was No Revolving Door In Washington D.C.? By Lance Winslow What if all businesses had to compete in free markets and every company survived or failed on their ability to deliver goods and services to the customers at a price point that worked for all parties? What if no business ever got a leg up or manipulated laws, rules or regulations to help them destroy their competitors or give them an unfair and obvious advantage? What if no regulator of any enforcement agency never joined any law firm or lobbyist firm to help one company get around the same ru… Cash Advance 4. Then And Now We were coffee shop prophets When Starbuck was a character Quoting Ibsen, Shaw, and Yeats Exact in predicting the downfall Of the country Of the society Of the arts We knew everything And voiced it in a Cacophony of catharsic certainty Individuality was our motto Toasted nightly with The same black coffee In the same white cups. We knew everything Then We sit now in polite conversation Stirring a low-fat latte, a cappi, expresso Recalling in exact detail (Maybe more colorfully) Clinging to a … |
||||
