The Price of LoyaltyLearn Politics on mps-politics.com. The Price of Loyalty article will help answer your questions on Politics.We at mps-politics.com specialize in Politics. Politics at mps-politics.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
Is that such an admirable quality? We prize the loyalty of our friends who protect our good name when we are not present. We respect the loyalty of committed couples who stay true to each other no matter the outside temptations. We recognize the loyalty of employees who stand by their ethics and keep competitors and enemies at bay. We treasure the loyalty of a soldier to his commander, if necessary to the death. We revere the loyalty of believers in their god and their unswerving commitment to their tenets of faith. We equate disloyalty with treason, dishonor, betrayal. We use names like Quisling, Benedict Arnold, Burgess and Hiss as epithets to express our loathing and disgust. But loyalty has a darker side. In crime families, loyalty means embracing death or imprisonment rather than exposing crime, violence, and murder. In prison, the most despised inmate is the 'snitch' who fails to stay silent about his knowledge of criminal acts, plots, and planned violence. Within adolescent groups and street gangs, the rule of silence and total loyalty is an absolute requirement for continued membership. The old courts of kings and emperors were rife with sycophants: whatever the leader wanted to hear, they offered. Disagreements and alternative plans for the direction of governance were considered intrigue - dangerous differences of opinion to be rooted out and permanently excised from the body politic. Where does the White House fit in? For all the positive connotations that loyalty may engender, we must look to the extent it is used and continually monitor it for abuse. No one would suggest that a President surround himself with staff who constantly criticize his ideas or regularly publicly disagree with his programs and proposals. However, the negative aspect of over-loyalty - zealousness - must be confronted if the goal is to weave plans for the common good through compromise in the face of diverse opinion. The United States was born out of public political and ideological debate. While the framers of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution has fundamental beliefs in common, they did not hesitate to publicly disagree and argue in an effort to reach the most workable goals. For more than two centuries, American political discourse has embraced differences more often than celebrating similarities. Commonly, the friction and arguments of elections become translated into legislation and leadership that seeks to bridge the gaps and bring all into the common fold. What seems to have changed is the willingness to let disparate views and opinions coexist. We have moved from a mentality that celebrates diversity and multiplicity to a narrow conception of what is right, absolutely right. Other opinions are not valued for the richness their views add to the national fabric but are considered wrong, without value, discounted, dangerously unpatriotic. The second term White House has purified its dogma, filtering our nuances and opposing ideas until everything is distilled into the single voice of one man. The moat around the faithful has been filled, the crocs loosed, and the land lies fallow beneath the keen eye of the true believers. Arrogance and disdain, disguised as 'political capital,' has the potential to morph into a level of power and intolerance that can only encourage eventual, inevitable, corruption.
Super PACs are raising and spending tens of millions of dollars to influence this year's presidential election. So what are super PACs? Where do they get their money, and who are they supporting? What rules govern super PACs? How do super PACs, or "independent expenditure-only committees," differ from traditional political-action committees? We have the answers: What are Super PACs? originally appeared on About.com US Politics on Wednesday, February 8th, 2012 at 09:20:39. Article Index: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 |
More Articles:1. Bush refuses to back down Never known to back down from a fight, PresidentBush is again demonstrating that same non-compromising stubbornnessin the John Bolton U.N. appointment fight.All of this, even though some conservative senators don't like Boltonand along side the democrats, refuse to end the filibuster until theBush administration releases some secret documents. When asked what itwould take to end the filibuster, Trent Lott said '...simply for theWhite House to release the documents requested.'What is in the… 2. A New New Deal By Lance Winslow Some say that the plans for the Gulf Coast after Hurricane Katrina resembles the new deal set forth by FDR. At a quick glance it maybe hard to disagree. The clean up efforts, rebuilding and defense system infrastructure, which must be put in place to prevent such a future repeated disaster has been estimated that it will cost as much as $155 Billion dollars and now some news agencies are talking in the neighborhood of 200 Billion Dollars.What do you think of the new deal? Many leaders who stud… 3. "Legal" Theft by Government By Charles Stone Those of the libertarian bent are often accused by statists of overreacting to the predations of government. “We are the government,” they say, “our elected officials are only doing the things we elected them to do, so what's the problem?”In many (even most) cases they may be right. We do tend to be a bit hypercritical of the machinations of our leaders, but not always.If you want a glimpse into predatory government at its worst, take a look at what's going on in Alabaster, Alabama. Alabaster… 0% Credit Cards Refinance Mortgage Christian Recovery 4. PALS in Pakistan Part Six - Objections to PALS Some arms control experts voice a variety of objections to transferring PALS technology to Pakistan and other states. These range from objections to the likelihood of Pakistan's acceptance of the program to political objections to the ramifications that granting Pakistan PALS will have on other states that are considering proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. While there may be validity to some of these objections, the on balance effect of a technology transfer program dealing with PALS … |
||||
