The Supreme Court: Past, Present and FutureLearn Politics on mps-politics.com. The Supreme Court: Past, Present and Future article will help answer your questions on Politics.We at mps-politics.com specialize in Politics. Politics at mps-politics.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.
The United States Supreme Court has been an active focus of politicians, news media, and concerned citizens in recent months. The scrutiny of the Supreme Court Justices erupted when Chief Justice Sandra Day O’Connor retired from her position on the Supreme Court. Debate about who should replace her on the Supreme Court filled daily talk shows, political arenas, and dinner tables. President George W. Bush nominated John G. Roberts and the process of his confirmation is in the works. Recently another Supreme Court position opened as Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist passed away. President George W. Bush will need to appoint another candidate for confirmation. Therefore, the composition of the Supreme Court Justices will be an intense topic of debate for many months to come. Why not become an informed citizen and improve your knowledge about the United States Supreme Court? Perhaps you already listen to news talk radio in your car on the way to work. Try popping in an audio book instead. Go head to head with the news talk radio hosts when you learn more about the political system. For instance, let's say you are interested in learning more about soon-to-be retired justice Sandra Day O'Connor. Try checking out her audio title "The Majesty of the Law: Reflections of a Supreme Court Justice". This title will help to give you greater insight into this remarkable lady. To acquire a more thorough background on the United States Supreme Court there are a couple of courses that you'll likely enjoy listening to. The Teaching Company has a great course called "The History of the Supreme Court" by Peter Irons. A similar title from the Barnes & Noble Portable Professor series is "Shaping Justice". These courses cover some of the landmark cases in our Supreme Court's history and allow you to hear more details of controversial rulings like abortion and free speech. Do you watch “Meet the Press” with host Tim Russert? In April of 2005 he had the opportunity to interview Chief Justices Stephen Breyer, Sandra Day O’Connor, and Antonin Scalia and the audio version is available here. Hear their thoughts and experiences as Supreme Court Justices and how the interpretation of the Constitution is integral to their roles. And there are even a couple of Supreme Court-related podcasts you can try listening to. Check out "The Oyez Supreme Court Podcast" by Jerry Goldman. This is a bi-weekly discussion of Supreme Court cases from the past and present and insight into future Supreme Court cases is included. Another podcast to try is Evan Schaeffer's "Legal Underground Podcast". It's not entirely devoted to the Supreme Court but there are some very relevant episodes. These are great supplements to the audio books listed earlier and to news talk radio. Plunge into the debate by understanding the Supreme Court as well as the Chief Justice nomination process. It's an incredibly important part of our political process and now, thanks to these audio programs, is easier to learn about than ever before. Secrets Of Hypnosis - Hypnotic Success. - Personal Magnetism & Hypnotic Attraction, Supreme Self Esteem, Your Brain in Your Underwear, Deep Sleep, Wealth Wizard and More. Predict Market Turning Points! - Fibonacci trading of stocks, futures, and forex. Yesterday I blogged about the rumored Obama budget that did nothing more than freeze the current budget for 5 years. At a time when the bloat in the federal budget has destroyed our position in the ... [Author: Ken Kaplan - Politics and Government - March 28, 2011] Article Index: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 |
More Articles:1. Bush Victory: A Defeat for the Have-Nots? By Virginia Bola, PsyD The shouting is over and directions for the next four years selected. Judging by past behavior (the best predictor, psychologically, of future behavior), we can look forward to:1. Continued and probably expanded tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and large Corporations. It is no surprise that the stock market soared on the election news: big business stands to gain greatly by the results. Predictions? A strong effort to curtail product lawsuits, no matter how valid, to protect bottom line … 2. Is it just hubris, or ...? By Humair Ishtiaq In what the Americans love to describe as the war on terror, there have been no clear winners even though it has been physically going on now for over three years. By the looks of it, the tussle between the United States of America and its perceived enemy will outlast the Second World War at least in terms of duration, if nothing else. If so, it certainly represents a horrible scenario for the planet.What lies at the heart of the conflict between the two sides -- if, indeed, there is a second … 3. Should Judgeships Be a Political Event? By Lance Winslow Thought of the day; Questions about the judicial system. If the judgeships in our country are political positions based on the way they are chosen, either by election or by appointment and often debated by opposing politicians, then is there really a three branches of government? And if there is not three separate and unique branches then how can we base our trust in any of the other two branches. And is such an obvious question not adding to the mistrust already inherent in the dog eat dog wo… 4. President Hillary Rodham Clinton? Is America ready for Hillary Clinton as President of the United States? I, for one, am NOT, as I am sure many others are in agreement. But then we have the shallow-minded intransigents, of whom fail to deem beyond what they consider, their own indubitable intellect. They are too busy looking within themselves to see what is before them. Therefore, eagerly leaping onto the Political jackass, they blindly err as a Steed...Or should we say 'Mare'. I have nothing personally against Mrs. Clinton, oth… |
||||
