Who Are The Gang of 14? Will Their Agreement Survive Through Latest Judicial Nomination?



Learn Politics on mps-politics.com. Who Are The Gang of 14? Will Their Agreement Survive Through Latest Judicial Nomination? article will help answer your questions on Politics.We at mps-politics.com specialize in Politics. Politics at mps-politics.com provides the most up to date news and articles. If you have questions please do not hesitate to contact us.

Seven Democrats and seven Republicans signed the “Memorandum of Understanding” detailing an agreement which averted a senatorial crisis in the Spring of 2005.

The crisis centered around the use of the filibuster rule by Democrats in the Senate to indefinitely stall judicial nominees from getting an up or down vote on the Senate floor.

The Republican party has 56 members in the U.S. Senate while the Democratic party has 43 and there is 1 independent in the 107the Congress. An agreement between 7 senators of both parties provided the necessary math for any judicial vote.

A filibuster is an open ended debate on the merits of any issue. "Cloture" places a time limit on debate and moves the issue to the Senate floor for a vote of all Senators. Cloture requires 60 votes. By using the filibuster to block judicial nominees from attaining a floor vote, the Democrats have essentially required a "super-majority" of 60 votes to confirm a nominee, rather than a simple majority of 51, thus retaining an effective veto over nominees that they view unfavorably.

With this tactic successfully used to thwart certain judicial nominees of the Bush Presidency from gaining an up or down vote for years in some cases, Senate Republicans threatened a parliamentary procedure that would remove the filibuster rule for judicial nominations. In retaliation for removing a long held and time honored protection of minority party rights, the Democrats threatened to grind all Senate business to a halt. A constitutional crisis hung over the capitol for months in early 2005.

The "gang of 14", organized by Senator John McCain bound themselves by an agreement to end the crisis, whereby the seven Democrats would vote in favor of cloture for future nominees except in "extraordinary circumstances", allowing each signatory to decide if such circumstances exist. If 56 Republicans were in agreement to end a filibuster, the 7 additional Democratic votes would equal 63 votes, and be enough for cloture, ending debate and allowing a vote. In exchange, the seven Republicans agreed to oppose any rule change in the Senate that would end the filibuster rule for judicial nominees. The total votes of 43 Democrats, 1 Independent (who usually votes Democratic), and 7 Republicans is 51 votes, enough to defeat any attempt at a rule change.

The Memorandum of Understanding also ended filibuster on 3 of 5 nominees who had been thwarted from receiving consideration on the Senate floor through this tactic: Janice Rogers Brown, William Pryor, and Priscilla Owen. All were subsequently confirmed by the Senate. No agreement for cloture was made for two other nominees, William Myers, and Henry Saad.

Signatories of the “Memorandum of Understanding”

John McCain (R) AZ
Lindsey Graham (R) SC
Mike DeWine (R) OH
Olympia Snowe (R) ME
Susan Collins (R) ME
John Warner (R) VA
Lincoln Chafee (R) RI

Ben Nelson (D) NE
Mark Pryor (D) AR
Mary Landrieu (D) LA
Ken Salazar (D) CO
Robert Byrd (D) WV
Joseph Lieberman (D) CT
Daniel Inouye (D) HI



Instant Article Submitter. - Amazing Breakthrough Software Stuffs Any Website You Want Full Of Free Targeted Traffic.
XoftSpy - #1 Converting Anti-Spyware App. - Top Xoftspy Affiliates Earn $3,000 Per Day Through Google Adwords & Overture. High Conversion Rates!


Article Index: | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | 55 | 56 | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60

More Articles:


1. Common Sense vs. Common Senseless - How Thomas Paine Can Be Applied To Modern Day; Part One By Alexia Lunningham
INTRODUCTIONPERHAPS the sentiments contained in the following pages, are not yet sufficiently fashionable to procure them general favor; a long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right, and raises at first a formidable outcry in defence of custom. But the tumult soon subsides. Time makes more converts than reason.You don’t want to hear this, you are content in your general ignorance. You have been brainwashed into thinking that your personal views a…

2. End Of History? Not Quite By Mithun Bhattacharya
A visitor to Moscow would be immediately struck by the fact that an otherwise dull Kremlin now seduces one to break the sound barrier in a mike, rediscover one self on a Compaq or simply feel Warner in a Pringles. If this is not enough then there is always Chairman Mao in Tiananmen Square calling upon workers and peasants to not only carry forward the revolution but also gulp down a Sprite, while they are at it. Numerous more examples abound from the Adriatic, so what does it all signify? Is …

3. The Dragons By Robert Baird
I hope to provide a starting point for the serious scholar interested in the all important Chanes of Central America and convince researchers to look into the Egyptian dragons (crocodiles) and Chinese as well. I suspect the Li or Lee family of Merovingians has some connection to the Nestorian and Basilian types long before the Kuomintang which Andre Malraux knew was a high level Masonic structure. It is most important to look at the work of alien reptoid or Elohim promoters of all stripe and c…
Tooth Whitening
4. Warren Buffet Slams IRS into Obedience and Submission By Lance Winslow
We all know that the Internal Revenue Service is a FEAR based agency, which attempts to threaten us citizens into submission. It uses tactics of fear very similar to the International Terrorists in order to service its will and extort money from us. It does this because we are told the government cannot complete all its very important responsibilities without this money. Yet the Internal Revenue service like any other agency is highly inefficient, as per the GAO Government Accounting Office;ww…